Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amanda Royal's avatar

Nice, in-depth article, and you scooped the New York Times by a couple of months: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/13/science/berkeley-mine-pit-rare-earths.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare

To me, this is the key paragraph: "California's stringent regulatory framework, designed to prioritize environmental protections, has made domestic processing particularly challenging. Across the rare earths industry, this dependence on Chinese facilities exposes a significant vulnerability in the rare earth supply chain, leaving the United States and other countries reliant on foreign infrastructure to produce critical materials essential for technologies such as electric vehicles and advanced military systems."

Strict regulations often result in exporting environmental damage to poorer nations. Case in point: We won't approve Pebble Mine in Alaska but we are encouraging development of a huge copper mine in Africa. (I'm not in favor of Pebble!)

I believe much of our gold ore is sent to China for processing as well.

It's hard to imagine any kind of mining being able to be completely clean, but I was encouraged by the nano-filters discussed in the NYT article.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts